Use of Artificial Intelligence to develop an automated, outcome-baaed, prostate cancer grading system.
Over the past 15+ years myself and colleagues from Mount Sinai) have published extensively on the importance of standardizing and quantifying prostate cancer grading systems to improve risk discrimination and most importantly guide treatment. We focused on predicting likelihood of disease recurrence based on retrospective outcomes using the prostate needle biopsy. Although our earlier published studies have focused on the use of quantitative immunofluorescence combined with morphometry, we have been able to advance the field, by automating and quantifying prostate cancer grade solely from the prostate needle biopsy H&E whole slide digital image and then integrating these features with clinical data to predict outcomes. Such approaches, once validated, will allow informed treatment decisions including the use of active surveillance vs more interventional therapy such as surgery or radiation, These types of investigations require large amounts of heterogeneous image and clinical data sets to impact the clinical decision process and ultimately improve upon outcomes.
- Assess correlation of AI-grade with pathologist assigned grade in both the diagnostic needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimen.
- Correlation of prostate needle biopsy Gleason grade with prostatectomy grade and stage.
- Correlation of AI grade with long-term outcomes of PSA recurrence, metastasis and death from prostate cancer
- Redistribution of 3+4 and 4+3 on needle biopsy and association / correlation with prostatectomy dominant Gleason score / grade and stage including outcomes of PSA recurrence, metastasis and death from prostate cancer.
- Role of clinical risk factors including PSA levels, family history, prior biopsy etc with current needle biopsy and prostatectomy AI-grade.
Icahn School of Medicine and Precise Dx