Skip to Main Content

An official website of the United States government

About this Publication
Title
Serum metabolomic profiling of prostate cancer risk in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.
Pubmed ID
27673363 (View this publication on the PubMed website)
Digital Object Identifier
Publication
Br. J. Cancer. 2016 Oct; Volume 115 (Issue 9): Pages 1087-1095
Authors
Huang J, Mondul AM, Weinstein SJ, Koutros S, Derkach A, Karoly E, Sampson JN, Moore SC, Berndt SI, Albanes D
Affiliations
  • Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Metabolon, Inc., Morrisville, NC, USA.
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two recent metabolomic analyses found serum lipid, energy, and other metabolites related to aggressive prostate cancer risk up to 20 years prior to diagnosis.

METHODS: We conducted a serum metabolomic investigation of prostate cancer risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial that included annual serum total prostate-specific antigen measurement and digital rectal examination. This nested study included 380 cases diagnosed post-screening and 380 controls individually matched to cases on age, race, study centre, and blood-collection date (median time to diagnosis, 10 years (range 4.4-17 years)). Sera were analysed on a high-resolution accurate mass platform of ultrahigh-performance liquid and gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy that identified 695 known metabolites. Logistic regression conditioned on the matching factors estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals of risk associated with an 80th percentile increase in the log-metabolite signal.

RESULTS: Twenty-seven metabolites were associated with prostate cancer at P<0.05. Pyroglutamine, gamma-glutamylphenylalanine, phenylpyruvate, N-acetylcitrulline, and stearoylcarnitine showed the strongest metabolite-risk signals (ORs=0.53, 0.51, 0.46, 0.58, and 1.74, respectively; 0.001⩽P⩽0.006). Findings were similar for aggressive disease (peptide chemical class, P=0.03). None of the P-values were below the threshold of Bonferroni correction, however.

CONCLUSIONS: A unique metabolomic profile associated with post-screening prostate cancer is identified that differs from that in a previously studied, unscreened population.

Related CDAS Studies
Related CDAS Projects