Skip to Main Content

An official website of the United States government

About this Publication
Title
Interactions between genome-wide significant genetic variants and circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor 1, sex hormones, and binding proteins in relation to prostate cancer risk in the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium.
Pubmed ID
22459122 (View this publication on the PubMed website)
Digital Object Identifier
Publication
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012 May; Volume 175 (Issue 9): Pages 926-35
Authors
Tsilidis KK, Travis RC, Appleby PN, Allen NE, Lindstrom S, Schumacher FR, Cox D, Hsing AW, Ma J, Severi G, Albanes D, Virtamo J, Boeing H, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Johansson M, Quirós JR, Riboli E, Siddiq A, Tjønneland A, Trichopoulos D, ...show more Tumino R, Gaziano JM, Giovannucci E, Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Stampfer MJ, Giles GG, Andriole GL, Berndt SI, Chanock SJ, Hayes RB, Key TJ
Affiliations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. kostas.tsilidis@ceu.ox.ac.uk
Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with prostate cancer risk. There is limited information on the mechanistic basis of these associations, particularly about whether they interact with circulating concentrations of growth factors and sex hormones, which may be important in prostate cancer etiology. Using conditional logistic regression, the authors compared per-allele odds ratios for prostate cancer for 39 GWAS-identified SNPs across thirds (tertile groups) of circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), testosterone, androstenedione, androstanediol glucuronide, estradiol, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) for 3,043 cases and 3,478 controls in the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium. After allowing for multiple testing, none of the SNPs examined were significantly associated with growth factor or hormone concentrations, and the SNP-prostate cancer associations did not differ by these concentrations, although 4 interactions were marginally significant (MSMB-rs10993994 with androstenedione (uncorrected P = 0.008); CTBP2-rs4962416 with IGFBP-3 (uncorrected P = 0.003); 11q13.2-rs12418451 with IGF-1 (uncorrected P = 0.006); and 11q13.2-rs10896449 with SHBG (uncorrected P = 0.005)). The authors found no strong evidence that associations between GWAS-identified SNPs and prostate cancer are modified by circulating concentrations of IGF-1, sex hormones, or their major binding proteins.

Related CDAS Studies
Related CDAS Projects