Skip to Main Content

An official website of the United States government

About this Publication
Noninvasive Computed Tomography-based Risk Stratification of Lung Adenocarcinomas in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Pubmed ID
26052977 (View this publication on the PubMed website)
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015 Jun; Volume [Epub ahead of print]: Pages [Epub ahead of print]
Maldonado F, Duan F, Raghunath SM, Rajagopalan S, Karwoski RA, Garg K, Greco E, Nath H, Robb RA, Bartholmai BJ, Peikert T
  • 1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
  • 2 Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • 3 Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, and.
  • 5 Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado; and.
  • 6 Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • 4 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

RATIONALE: Screening for lung cancer using low-dose computed tomography (CT) reduces lung cancer mortality. However, in addition to a high rate of benign nodules, lung cancer screening detects a large number of indolent cancers that generally belong to the adenocarcinoma spectrum. Individualized management of screen-detected adenocarcinomas would be facilitated by noninvasive risk stratification.

OBJECTIVES: To validate that Computer-Aided Nodule Assessment and Risk Yield (CANARY), a novel image analysis software, successfully risk stratifies screen-detected lung adenocarcinomas based on clinical disease outcomes.

METHODS: We identified retrospective 294 eligible patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma spectrum lesions in the low-dose CT arm of the National Lung Screening Trial. The last low-dose CT scan before the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma was analyzed using CANARY blinded to clinical data. Based on their parametric CANARY signatures, all the lung adenocarcinoma nodules were risk stratified into three groups. CANARY risk groups were compared using survival analysis for progression-free survival.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 294 patients were included in the analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis of all the 294 adenocarcinoma nodules stratified into the Good, Intermediate, and Poor CANARY risk groups yielded distinct progression-free survival curves (P < 0.0001). This observation was confirmed in the unadjusted and adjusted (age, sex, race, and smoking status) progression-free survival analysis of all stage I cases.

CONCLUSIONS: CANARY allows the noninvasive risk stratification of lung adenocarcinomas into three groups with distinct post-treatment progression-free survival. Our results suggest that CANARY could ultimately facilitate individualized management of incidentally or screen-detected lung adenocarcinomas.

Related CDAS Studies
Related CDAS Projects