Skip to Main Content

An official website of the United States government

About this Publication
Perinodular Parenchymal Features Improve Indeterminate Lung Nodule Classification.
Pubmed ID
35933282 (View this publication on the PubMed website)
Digital Object Identifier
Acad Radiol. 2023 Jun; Volume 30 (Issue 6): Pages 1073-1080
Masquelin AH, Alshaabi T, Cheney N, Estépar RSJ, Bates JHT, Kinsey CM
  • University of Vermont, Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, Burlington, VT, USA. Electronic address:
  • University of California Berkeley, Advanced Bioimaging Center Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • University of Vermont, Computer Science, Burlington, VT, USA.
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Radiology, Radiology 1249 Boylston St, Boston, MA, USA 02215.
  • University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
  • University of Vermont College of Medicine, Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Given D208, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Burlington, VT, USA, 05405.

BACKGROUND: Radiomics, defined as quantitative features extracted from images, provide a non-invasive means of assessing malignant versus benign pulmonary nodules. In this study, we evaluate the consistency with which perinodular radiomics extracted from low-dose computed tomography images serve to identify malignant pulmonary nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), we selected individuals with pulmonary nodules between 4mm to 20mm in diameter. Nodules were segmented to generate four distinct datasets; 1) a Tumor dataset containing tumor-specific features, 2) a 10 mm Band dataset containing parenchymal features between the segmented nodule boundary and 10mm out from the boundary, 3) a 15mm Band dataset, and 4) a Tumor Size dataset containing the maximum nodule diameter. Models to predict malignancy were constructed using support-vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) approaches. Ten-fold cross validation with 10 repetitions per fold was used to evaluate the performance of each approach applied to each dataset.

RESULTS: With respect to the RF, the Tumor, 10mm Band, and 15mm Band datasets achieved areas under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) of 84.44%, 84.09%, and 81.57%, respectively. Significant differences in performance were observed between the Tumor and 15mm Band datasets (adj. p-value <0.001). However, when combining tumor-specific features with perinodular features, the 10mm Band + Tumor and 15mm Band + Tumor datasets (AUC 87.87% and 86.75%, respectively) performed significantly better than the Tumor Size dataset (66.76%) or the Tumor dataset. Similarly, the AUCs from the SVM and LASSO were 84.71% and 88.91%, respectively, for the 10mm Band + Tumor.

CONCLUSIONS: The combined 10mm Band + Tumor dataset improved the differentiation between benign and malignant lung nodules compared to the Tumor datasets across all methodologies. This demonstrates that parenchymal features capture novel diagnostic information beyond that present in the nodule itself. (data agreement: NLST-163).

Related CDAS Studies
Related CDAS Projects