Skip to Main Content

An official website of the United States government

About this Publication
Title
Extended Delay to Treatment for Stage III-IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Survival: Balancing Risks During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Pubmed ID
35660355 (View this publication on the PubMed website)
Digital Object Identifier
Publication
Clin Lung Cancer. 2022 Sep; Volume 23 (Issue 6): Pages e362-e376
Authors
Mayne NR, Bajaj SS, Powell J, Elser HC, Civiello BS, Fintelmann FJ, Li X, Yang CJ
Affiliations
  • Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
  • Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UC Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA.
  • Seacoast Cancer Center at Wentworth Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH.
  • Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Seacoast Cancer Center at Wentworth Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH. Electronic address: cjyang@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients may encounter lung cancer care delays. Here, we sought to examine the impact of extended treatment delay for stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer on patient survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data, Cox regression analysis with penalized smoothing splines was performed to examine the association between treatment delay and all-cause mortality for stage III-IV lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. In the NCDB, propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare cumulative survival in patients who received "early" versus "delayed" treatment (ie, 0-30 vs. 90-120 days following diagnosis).

RESULTS: Cox regression analysis of the NLST (n = 392) and NCDB (n = 275,198) cohorts showed a decrease in hazard ratio the longer treatment was delayed. In propensity score-matched analysis, no significant differences in survival were found between early and delayed treatment for patients with stage IIIA, IIIB (T3-4,N2,M0), IIIC, and IV (M1B-C) adenocarcinoma and patients with IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IV squamous cell carcinoma (all log-rank P > .05). For patients with stage IIIB (T1-2,N3,M0) and stage IV (M1A) adenocarcinoma, delayed treatment was associated with improved survival (log-rank P = .03, P = .02). The findings were consistent in sensitivity analysis accounting for wait time bias.

CONCLUSION: In this national analysis, for patients with stage III-IV adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, an extended treatment delay by 3 to 4 months was not associated with significantly decreased overall survival compared to prompt treatment. These findings can be used to guide decision-making during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Related CDAS Studies
Related CDAS Projects