Skip to Main Content

An official website of the United States government

About this Publication
Title
Inflammatory potential of diet and colorectal carcinogenesis: a prospective longitudinal cohort.
Pubmed ID
35136208 (View this publication on the PubMed website)
Digital Object Identifier
Publication
Br J Cancer. 2022 Feb 8
Authors
Li Z, Wang K, Shivappa N, Hébert JR, Chen H, Liu H, Jiang X
Affiliations
  • West China School of Nursing/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Cancer Prevention and Control Program and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • West China School of Nursing/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. jiangxiaolianhl@163.com.
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acknowledging the role of inflammation in colorectal carcinogenesis, this study aimed to evaluate the associations between diet-associated inflammation, as measured by the energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index (E-DIITM), and distinct stages of colorectal carcinogenesis.

METHODS: The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial enrolled participants without a colorectal cancer history, who were asked to complete baseline questionnaires and food frequency questionnaires. To estimate the associations between the E-DII and risks of newly incident colorectal adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and colorectal cancer, multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed.

RESULTS: Among 101,680 participants, with an average age of 65 years, a total of 1177 incident colorectal adenoma cases, 895 recurrent adenoma cases and 1100 colorectal cancer cases were identified. Higher E-DII scores from food and supplement (HRQ5 vs Q1: 0.86 [0.69-1.06], Ptrend: 0.27) or from food only (HRQ5 vs Q1: 0.82 [0.64-1.05], Ptrend: 0.06) were not associated with higher risks of incident adenoma. However, the elevated risk of recurrent adenoma was found in the highest category of E-DII from food plus supplement (HRQ5 vs Q1: 1.63 [1.28-2.03], Ptrend: < 0.001) when compared with the lowest category. A significant association between colorectal cancer risk and E-DII from food plus supplement (HRQ5 vs Q1: 1.34 [1.09-1.65], Ptrend: 0.009) was found, where this association was only pronounced in distal colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION: Higher E-DII scores from diet plus supplement but not from diet only were associated with a higher risk of recurrent adenoma and distal colorectal cancer. The role of nutrient supplements on cancer risk, especially when combined with diet, needs to be elucidated in future studies.

Related CDAS Studies
Related CDAS Projects