Skip to Main Content

An official website of the United States government

Principal Investigator
Name
Zaina Qureshi
Institution
South Carolina College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina
Email
About this CDAS Project
Study
PLCO (Learn more about this study)
Project ID
2011-0087
Initial CDAS Request Approval
May 19, 2011
Title
Screening interval based on initial PSA: Data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial
Summary
Introduction: The value of early detection of prostate cancer remains to be established. However, PSA screening is commonplace and is generally conducted on an annual basis. The effects of a change in screening patterns are unknown. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the consequences and costs of Prostate Cancer screening and establish the most cost effective screening guidelines for prostate cancer.Materials and Methods: The PLCO Trial is a large controlled trial that recruited 76,693 men aged 55-74, and randomized them to a screening arm or usual care arm. PSA will be determined at screening rounds. A prostate cancer will be considered to be screen-detected if it was diagnosed following a positive PSA screening exam. All men who have a PSA =4ng/mL at baseline and at least one subsequent test will be included. We will evaluate changes in PSA for each year over 5 years among men in the screening arm who had baseline PSA levels ranging from < 1ng/ml to = 4 ng/mL and at least one subsequent PSA exam. The cumulative proportion of men who convert from PSA =4 ng/mL at baseline to PSA >4 ng/mL at years 1 through 5 will be determined. Only those cancers with available Gleason grading will be included. A PSA level of >4ng/mL will be considered positive for prostate cancer. Gleason scores of >6 will be considered aggressive. A Kaplan-Meier will be used to estimate the cumulative proportion of men converting to a PSA above 4 ng/mL during the screening rounds. Cost saved due to increase in PSA screening intervals will be analyzed.
Aims

To analyze the data from the PLCO cancer screening trial to assess the consequences, costs, and cost-effectiveness of Prostate Cancer screening and establish the most cost effective screening guidelines for prostate cancer.

Collaborators

Anthony D’Amico (Harvard Medical School)
Charles L Bennett (South Carolina College of Pharmacy)
David Crawford (University of Colorado)
Michael Kattan (Case Western Reserve University)
Nicole Mittmann (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre)
Zaina P Qureshi (South Carolina College of Pharmacy)