Outcomes associated with significant incidental findings in lung cancer screening
In the course of LDCT screening, potentially significant abnormalities unrelated to lung cancer, commonly referred to as significant incidental findings (SIFs), are often detected. As lung screening becomes widely adopted, the high prevalence of these SIFs is a major concern. In the NLST, SIFs were detected in 10% of participants at the first screen and an average of 6% at each of the two incidence screens. Detection of a SIF frequently leads to additional diagnostic interventions, which increases the costs of screening as well as the risks associated with screening. Yet the impact of these LDCT-detected SIFs on patient morbidity and mortality remains unclear. Although there is evidence from smaller studies that SIFs are associated with the diagnosis of extrapulmonary cancers and with the detection of markers for cardiovascular disease, there are no similar data available from large multi-center trials. More importantly, there is no evidence linking the early detection of these abnormalities with a reduction in morbidity or mortality. In addition, no publications from large, multi-center, randomized trials of LDCT screening have reported information on complications associated with SIF detection. Further complicating the issue is that the outcomes associated with SIF detection are likely to be heterogeneous, differing according to the nature of the SIF and organ location. Research is needed to determine whether this early detection is associated with the reported reduction in all-cause mortality observed in the LDCT arm of the NLST, and to identify which SIF findings are likely to result in a cancer diagnosis, as well as those SIF findings most likely to be associated with complications during the post-screening period.
The NLST is the only large, multi-center, clinical trial with extended follow-up data available and provides a rich resource to evaluate the association between SIF detection and patient morbidity and mortality. This information is of vital importance, because as lung screening disseminates, identifying the SIFs for which follow-up enhances patient health, as opposed to the SIFs for which follow-up is likely unnecessary, is crucial to the success of lung screening programs. This project seeks to elucidate the potential health and mortality impacts associated with a SIF finding on LDCT. We will use data from the NLST to investigate the unintended downstream consequences of implementing LDCT screening. By describing and quantifying these consequences in the NLST population, we can anticipate the impact of screening implementation in the general population and provide information for the development of practice guidelines designed to maximize the health impact of LDCT lung screening and minimize any negative consequences.
Aim 1: To determine whether NLST participants with any LDCT-detected SIF had lower all-cause mortality than a similar population of CXR-screened participants with consistently negative screening results, and to examine short- and long-term mortality according to the type of SIF.
We hypothesize that patients with a SIF detected at LDCT lung screening will have lower mortality than will patients with no abnormalities on CXR lung screening, and that this mortality benefit will differ by type of SIF. We further hypothesize that SIF detection will be responsible for differences in all-cause mortality across the screening arms.
Aim 2: To determine if a SIF detected at LDCT lung screening was associated with an extrapulmonary cancer diagnosis in the year following the screening exam compared with patients with a negative screen. To examine cancer diagnoses by type of SIF, during the trial, and to determine whether this association continued over the extended follow-up period.
We hypothesize that patients with SIFs detected at LDCT lung screening will have a cancer diagnosis more often than patients with no SIF, and that the frequency of cancer diagnosis will differ by organ in which a SIF is located.
Aim 3: To determine if SIF detection was associated with a higher rate of iatrogenic medical complications in the 60 days following screening compared with participants with no SIFs.
We hypothesize that participants with SIFs detected will experience more complications than will participants with negative screen results.
Royi Gutman Brown University Co-Investigator
Constantine Gatsonis Brown University Co-Investigator
Amal Trivedi Brown University Co-Investigator
Caroline Chiles Wake Forest School of Medicine Other (Specify)-Subcontract PI
-
Significant Incidental Findings in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Gareen IF, Gutman R, Sicks J, Tailor TD, Hoffman RM, Trivedi AN, Flores E, Underwood E, Cochancela J, Chiles C
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 May 8 PUBMED