Skip to Main Content

COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.

What people with cancer should know: https://www.cancer.gov/coronavirus

Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov

Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus

About this Publication
Title
National Lung Screening Trial Findings by Age: Medicare-Eligible Versus Under-65 Population.
Pubmed ID
25199624 (View this publication on the PubMed website)
Publication
Ann. Intern. Med. 2014 Nov; Volume 161 (Issue 9): Pages 627-633
Authors

Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Hocking W, Patz EF, Kramer BS

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The NLST (National Lung Screening Trial) showed reduced lung cancer mortality in high-risk participants (smoking history of ≥30 pack-years) aged 55 to 74 years who were randomly assigned to screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus those assigned to chest radiography. An advisory panel recently expressed reservations about Medicare coverage of LDCT screening because of concerns about performance in the Medicare-aged population, which accounted for only 25% of the NLST participants.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of the NLST LDCT group by age (Medicare-eligible vs. <65 years).

DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a group from a randomized trial (NCT00047385).

SETTING: 33 U.S. screening centers.

PATIENTS: 19 612 participants aged 55 to 64 years (under-65 cohort) and 7110 participants aged 65 to 74 years (65+ cohort) at randomization.

INTERVENTION: 3 annual rounds of LDCT screening.

MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, smoking and medical history, screening examination adherence and results, diagnostic follow-up procedures and complications, lung cancer diagnoses, treatment, survival, and mortality.

RESULTS: The aggregate false-positive rate was higher in the 65+ cohort than in the under-65 cohort (27.7% vs. 22.0%; P < 0.001). Invasive diagnostic procedures after false-positive screening results were modestly more frequent in the older cohort (3.3% vs. 2.7%; P = 0.039). Complications from invasive procedures were low in both groups (9.8% in the under-65 cohort vs. 8.5% in the 65+ cohort). Prevalence and positive predictive value (PPV) were higher in the 65+ cohort (PPV, 4.9% vs. 3.0%). Resection rates for screen-detected cancer were similar (75.6% in the under-65 cohort vs. 73.2% in the 65+ cohort). Five-year all-cause survival was lower in the 65+ cohort (55.1% vs. 64.1%; P = 0.018).

LIMITATION: The oldest screened patient was aged 76 years.

CONCLUSION: NLST participants aged 65 years or older had a higher rate of false-positive screening results than those younger than 65 years but a higher cancer prevalence and PPV. Screen-detected cancer was treated similarly in the groups.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Related CDAS Studies
Related CDAS Projects