Skip to Main Content
An official website of the United States government

Generative models for reproducible coronary calcium scoring.

Authors

van Velzen SGM, de Vos BD, Noothout JMH, Verkooijen HM, Viergever MA, Išgum I

Affiliations

  • Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • University Medical Center Utrecht, Imaging Division, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Purpose: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, i.e., the amount of CAC quantified in CT, is a strong and independent predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) events. However, CAC scoring suffers from limited interscan reproducibility, which is mainly due to the clinical definition requiring application of a fixed intensity level threshold for segmentation of calcifications. This limitation is especially pronounced in non-electrocardiogram-synchronized computed tomography (CT) where lesions are more impacted by cardiac motion and partial volume effects. Therefore, we propose a CAC quantification method that does not require a threshold for segmentation of CAC. Approach: Our method utilizes a generative adversarial network (GAN) where a CT with CAC is decomposed into an image without CAC and an image showing only CAC. The method, using a cycle-consistent GAN, was trained using 626 low-dose chest CTs and 514 radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) CTs. Interscan reproducibility was compared to clinical calcium scoring in RTP CTs of 1662 patients, each having two scans. Results: A lower relative interscan difference in CAC mass was achieved by the proposed method: 47% compared to 89% manual clinical calcium scoring. The intraclass correlation coefficient of Agatston scores was 0.96 for the proposed method compared to 0.91 for automatic clinical calcium scoring. Conclusions: The increased interscan reproducibility achieved by our method may lead to increased reliability of CHD risk categorization and improved accuracy of CHD event prediction.

Publication Details

PubMed ID
35664539

Digital Object Identifier
10.1117/1.JMI.9.5.052406

Publication
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022 Sep; Volume 9 (Issue 5): Pages 052406

Related CDAS Studies Related CDAS Studies