Skip to Main Content

An official website of the United States government

Explore the Early Phase Prevention Trials
Access to Data and Biospecimens
View 0 Studies Requested

Intermittent or Continuous Acetylsalicylic Acid and Gene Expression in the Nasal Tissue of Current Smokers

Trial Summary

This randomized, double-blinded phase II trial studies the safety and effects of acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) taken continuously or intermittently on gene expression in the nasal tissue of current smokers. ASA is suspected to be useful in preventing lung cancer. The change (if any) in gene expression as well as any difference between the results of each study arm is to be evaluated.

Randomized trial with two arms:

  • Arm I: ASA (1 x 81mg capsule) daily.
  • Arm II: Alternating weekly between ASA (1 x 81mg capsule daily) and Placebo (1 capsule daily).

Target Randomizable Enrollment: 56

Target Evaluable Enrollment: 40

Statistical Analysis:

The study planned to randomize 56 eligible participants to have at least 40 participants (20 per arm) with the complete set of evaluable specimens for biomarker analysis, based on an estimated attrition rate of 25%. A one-sided two-sample t test at a significance level of 5% was performed to evaluate whether intermittent ASA is non-inferior to continuous ASA in changes of the gene signature scores. Additional regression analysis was performed to adjust for baseline levels and/or potential confounders, for example, gender or BMI. A two-sided two-sample t test was used to compare the baseline values of gene signature scores between the intervention arms and the baseline values of PGEM and LTE4 and changes in PGEM and LTE4 levels between the intervention arms. A two-sided paired t test was performed to evaluate the changes in gene signature scores, PGEM and LTE4 overall, by intervention arm, and by gender. All of the secondary analyses are considered exploratory so no correction for multiple comparisons were used. The Fisher's exact test was used to compare the frequency of adverse events between the intervention arms.

Differential gene expression was calculated between sample collection time points: (i) baseline to end-of-intervention, (ii) baseline to one-week post intervention, and (iii) end-of-intervention to one-week post intervention in samples that passed quality control metrics (n = 109). These analyses reflect the genomic effects of ASA exposure, ASA exposure with persistence beyond one week, and ASA withdrawal, respectively. Differential gene expression was calculated for each comparison using linear modeling via the R package limma (28), adjusting for ASA dosing arm and blocking by subject. Adjusted p-values (FDR) <0.25 were considered significant. The EnrichR tool (29) was used to explore the functional role of significant genes. Additional pathway analyses were conducted using gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; ref. 30) and genes rank ordered by t-statistic for each ASA effect from the linear modeling results. GSEA was used to assess enrichment of biology presumed to be modulated by aspirin exposure, and gene sets related to repair and wound healing from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB; ref. 31). GSEA was also used to screen the curated Canonical Pathways (C2) within MSigDB and adjusted P values (FDR) <0.05 were considered significant. The most highly enriched genes from the significant gene sets were compiled using the Leading Edge Analysis tool. We also compared ASA-associated gene-expression alterations between the two dosing arms. Paired t tests were computed between baseline and end-of-intervention within each arm. The results of this analysis were used to construct dosing arm specific ranked lists of genes by t-statistic and gene sets (the top 100 most up- and down-regulated genes). GSEA was used to establish ASA-associated gene-expression changes between the two arms using these ranked lists and gene sets.