Skip to Main Content
An official website of the United States government
Login Change: CDAS is now using the NIH Researcher Auth Service (RAS) to manage our existing login options. When logging into CDAS, you will be taken to RAS, where you can select your preferred login provider to access CDAS.

Low-Dose CT Quality Assurance at Scale: Automated Detection of Overscanning, Underscanning, and Image Noise.

Authors

Wienholt P, Hermans A, Siepmann R, Kuhl C, Pinto Dos Santos D, Nebelung S, Truhn D

Affiliations

  • Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
  • Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
  • Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

Abstract

Automated quality assurance is essential for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung screening, yet manual checks strain clinical workflows. We present a fully automated artificial intelligence tool that quantifies scan coverage and image noise in LDCT without user input. Lungs and the aorta are segmented to measure cranial/caudal over- and underscanning, and noise is computed as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units (HUs) within descending aortic blood, normalized to a 1 mm3 voxel. Performance was verified in a reader study of 98 LDCT scans from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), and then applied to 38,834 NLST scans reconstructed with a standard kernel. In the reader study, lung masks were rated ≥"Nearly Perfect" in 90.8% and aorta-blood masks in 96.9% of cases. Across 38,834 scans, mean overscanning distances were 31.21 mm caudally and 14.54 mm cranially; underscanning occurred in 4.36% (caudal) and 0.89% (cranial). The tool enables objective, large-scale monitoring of LDCT quality-reducing routine manual workload through exception-based human oversight, flagging protocol deviations, and supporting cross-center benchmarking-and may facilitate dose optimization by reducing systematic over- and underscanning.

Publication Details

PubMed ID
41598306

Digital Object Identifier
10.3390/life16010152

Publication
Life (Basel). 2026 Jan 16; Volume 16 (Issue 1)

Related CDAS Studies Related CDAS Studies